AI notetaker that records, transcribes, summarizes and searches meetings across Zoom, Meet and Teams.
Notta vs Sonix
Features, pricing, strengths and trade-offs — and which one fits your situation.
The verdict
Notta is best for multilingual transcription with translation across meetings, recordings and uploads, while Sonix is best for transcribing and translating uploaded recordings with pay-per-hour pricing. Notta has a free plan, while Sonix offers a free trial.
Which should you choose?
Choose Notta if…
- You need multilingual transcription with translation across meetings, recordings and uploads
- You're one of: multilingual teams, researchers and students, journalists
- You want a free plan (Sonix only has a trial)
- Strong multilingual and translation options
Choose Sonix if…
- You need transcribing and translating uploaded recordings with pay-per-hour pricing
- You're one of: podcasters and video producers, researchers transcribing interviews, media and legal teams
- Pay-as-you-go option suits occasional users
At a glance
| Notta | Sonix | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Multilingual transcription with translation across meetings, recordings and uploads | Transcribing and translating uploaded recordings with pay-per-hour pricing |
| Free plan | Yes | Trial only |
| Starting price | From $8.17/mo | From $10/hr |
| Learning curve | Low | Low |
| Platforms | Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, Chrome extension | Web, API |
| Ideal for | Multilingual teams, Researchers and students, Journalists, Small businesses | Podcasters and video producers, Researchers transcribing interviews, Media and legal teams, Developers needing a transcription API |
Feature comparison
| Notta | Sonix | |
|---|---|---|
| Records without a bot joining | Yes | Limited |
| Meeting platforms | Zoom, Meet, Teams, Webex | Imports from Zoom, Meet, Teams, Webex |
| Transcription languages | 58 languages | 54+ languages |
| CRM sync | Business plan and up | No |
| Ask AI across meetings | Yes | Limited |
| Speaker identification | Yes | Yes |
| In-person / mobile recording | Yes | Web recorder only |
| Transcribe uploaded files | Yes | Yes |
| Translation | Paid plans only | Yes |
Security & enterprise
| Notta | Sonix | |
|---|---|---|
| Business / enterprise plan | Yes | Yes |
| SSO (SAML / OIDC) | Enterprise plan | Enterprise plan |
| SCIM user provisioning | — | — |
| SOC 2 | Type II | Type II |
| ISO 27001 | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA (BAA available) | — | BAA available |
| GDPR DPA | Yes | Yes |
| Data residency options | — | — |
| No training on your data | — | — |
| Audit logs | Enterprise plan | — |
| Admin controls | Enterprise plan | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
From each vendor's security documentation. "—" = not confirmed. What to ask vendors · Compare all tools
What each tool does
Notta
Notta is an AI transcription and meeting assistant that records Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams and Webex calls, transcribes in 58 languages and produces summaries and action items. It also transcribes uploaded files and in-person recordings via mobile apps, and offers transcript translation and bilingual transcription.
Key features- Meeting bot plus bot-free desktop recording
- Transcription in 58 languages with bilingual mode (add-on)
- Transcript translation on paid plans
- Notta Brain for Q&A across all recordings
- Generates documents, slides and mind maps from transcripts
- Mobile apps and Notta Memo hardware recorder
Sonix
Sonix is an automated transcription service where you upload audio or video and receive a timestamped, speaker-labelled transcript you can edit in the browser. It supports transcription and translation in 50+ languages, subtitle generation and AI analysis such as summaries, chapters and sentiment. It does not send a bot to join live meetings.
Key features- Automated transcription in 54+ languages
- Machine translation into 54+ languages
- In-browser transcript editor with speaker labels and timestamps
- AI summaries, chapters and sentiment analysis
- Subtitle generation and burn-in
- API, webhooks and Zapier automation
Pricing
Notta
Free plan (120 min/mo); Pro $8.17/mo annual ($13.99 monthly)
Sonix
30-min free trial; Pay-as-you-go $10/hr; Core subscription $25/mo
Prices last checked September 2026. Plans change often — confirm on each vendor's site.
Pros and cons
Notta
Strengths- Strong multilingual and translation options
- Handles live meetings, uploads and in-person recordings
- Security certifications including SOC 2, ISO 27001 and HIPAA
- Low-cost entry paid tier
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes
- CRM integrations are limited to Business plans and above
- Bilingual transcription is a paid add-on
- Monthly file upload counts are capped on every plan
Not ideal for: Users who want to test extensively on a free plan will find the 3-minute recording cap too restrictive.
Sonix
Strengths- Pay-as-you-go option suits occasional users
- Good editor for correcting and exporting transcripts
- Translation built into the same workflow
- Developer API and compliance options (SOC 2, HIPAA)
- No meeting bot to auto-join scheduled calls
- No dedicated mobile app
- No CRM integrations
- Per-hour transcription charges on top of subscriptions add up for heavy use
Not ideal for: Anyone who wants meetings recorded and summarized automatically without uploading files should use a meeting notetaker instead.
Integrations
Notta
Sonix
FAQ
What is the main difference between Notta and Sonix?
Notta is built for multilingual transcription with translation across meetings, recordings and uploads; Sonix is built for transcribing and translating uploaded recordings with pay-per-hour pricing.
Is Notta or Sonix cheaper?
Notta starts from $8.17/mo and Sonix starts from $10/hr (as of September 2026). On entry price, Notta is cheaper — but compare what each plan includes, since limits differ. Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site.
Do Notta and Sonix have free plans?
Notta has a free plan, while Sonix offers a free trial.
Which is easier to use, Notta or Sonix?
Both have a low learning curve.
What are good alternatives to Notta and Sonix?
Other meetings tools worth comparing include Fireflies.ai, Otter.ai and Fathom.